Role of Biplane double support screw fixation for fracture neck of femur in elderly population

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Orthopedic department,faculty of medicine,Tanta university,Tanta,Egypt

2 Orthopedic department,Faculty of medicine,Al Azhar university,Cairo,Egypt

3 Orthopedic department,Faculty of medicne,AlAzhar university,Cairo,Egypt

Abstract

Background:the treatment of fracture neck of femur varies according to the age of the patient ,displacement of fracture fragments and duration of the fracture.
Objective: to assess the effect of biplane double support screws in fixation of fracture neck of femur in elderly patients.
Patients and methods:this study was prospective case series study conducted in Al Hussein University Hospital Al Azhar university between January 2019 –January 2020. 20 patients aged more than 50 yrs with fracture neck of femur were included in the study .Out of the 20 patients,13 were males and 7 were females and they were operated with biplane double support screw fixation method(BDSF) and were followed up for a period of more than 6 months.
Results:out of the 20 patients, 9 patients were excellent, 6 patients were good, 3 patients were fair and 2 patients were poor outcome.
Conclusions:in elderly and in those patients who cannot afford arthroplasty or in those patients where arthroplasty is contraindicated, BDSF method is an alternate method for fixing fracture neck of femur.

Keywords


INTRODUCTION

Fracture of neck femur is a very common injury in patients more than 50 years of age. According to the present scenario, arthroplasty should be reserved for patients more than 80 years, while in patients age less than 65 sustaining fracture neck of femur, hip preservation should be attempted while the ideal treatment of fracture neck of femur in the age group 60-80 is still a matter of debate.1

A number of controversies exist in relation to the cannulated screw fixation for fracture neck femur like number of screws to be used, position of screws in the head and neck and the configuration of screws to be used. A number of biomechanical studies have been done in relation to the ideal screw configuration.2-9

While some authors have suggested central screw placement10, others have suggested peripheral screw placement.2,9-11 Some authors believe that the screws should be placed parallel to each other 3,4,11-13, while others believe that screws should be divergent in lateral view. 9-14

 

The most commonly used methods by surgeons worldwide to fix fracture neck femur is three parallel screws inserted in inverted triangle configuration.15-16 This does not always provide appropriate fixation strength. This is especially true if osteoporosis is present, and poor results might subsequently develop. The initial interfragmentary compression of these constructs is frequently insufficient and therefore unable to ensure stability in osteoporotic bone.17

Moreover, the constructs could be occasionally instable with regard to varus stresses, anteroposterior bending and torsion because of the screws inserted pretty close to each other with entry points localised in the rather thin section of the cortex near to the greater trochanter, lacking appropriate lateral cortical support. When cannulated screws are used to fix a femoral neck fracture with osteoporosis, intraoperative interfragmentary compression alone may not ensure adequate stability during the healing process because it could soon be lost on fracture impaction.17

To overcome this problem of osteoporosis and for those patients in which arthroplasty is contraindicated, Filipov devised a method of Biplane Double Supported Screw Fixation (BDSF) in which the two screws are laid in two planes, which makes it possible for the entry points of middle and distal screws to be placed in distal solid cortex of proximal diaphysis, the distal screw is placed in the dorsal oblique plane while the middle and proximal screws are inserted in ventral oblique plane. BDSF method uses two calcar buttressed screws: The position achieved by the distal as well as the middle screw, in view of statics, turns them into a simple beam with an overhanging end, loaded with avertical force. This beam with an overhanging end successfully supports the head fragment, bearing the body weight and transferring it to the diaphysis.17

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective case series study was carried out in Al Hussein University Hospital Al -Azhar University between January 2019 – January 2020. Twenty patients aged 50 - 67yrs with fracture neck of femur were included in the study. Patients < 50 yrs and those with old injury > 21 days are excluded from this study.  All patients will be subjected to full clinical examination, plain radiographs evaluation. Thirteen patients were male and seven patient were female (Table 1).

Variable

The studied population

(N=20)

Age(years)

Mean ± SD

Median (range)

 

60.67 ± 5.83

60 (51 - 72)

Sex

Male

13 (65%)

Female

7 (35%)

Table (1):  Demographic data of the patients.

 

Surgical technique

The patients are put supine on traction table and reduction is done by traction, internal rotation and slight abduction of the limb. A straight incision starting at the base of greater trochanter is made with a length of approximately 7-8 cm with BDSF method, three cannulated screws are put in two different planes in the lateral view. The distal screw is placed in the dorsal oblique plane while the middle and proximal screws are placed in the ventral oblique plane as shown in (Fig 1).

The first step is to put guide wire for the distal cannulated screw. Its tip is placed 5-7 cm distally from the base of the greater trochanter in the anterior one-third of the surface of the femoral diaphysis. It is directed proximally at an angle of 150-165o, with inclination from anteriorly–distally to posteriorly–proximally, so that after it touches on the curve of the distal femoral neck cortex, the wire goes into the posterior half of the femoral head as shown in (Fig 2). The middle guide wire is placed next. The entry point is at 2-4 cm proximally from the entry point of the distal wire, in the posterior one-third of femoral shaft.

 

 

Fig (1): showing positions of screws in AP&lateal views.

 

Fig (2): Showing position of first (distal) guidewire in the posterior half of femoral head.

This wire was placed at an angle of 135-140o and inclined from posteriorly-distally to anteriorly-proximally, so that after it touches the curve of the distal femoral neck cortex, the wire goes into the anterior one-third of the femoral head in the lateral view and in A-P view, the guidewire rests in distal one third of femoral head. The proximal guidewire was laid in the last. The entry point is 1-2 cm proximally from the entry point of middle wire in the posterior one-third of femoral shaft. It was placed parallel to the middle wire and is directed posterior-distally to anterior proximally so that in the A-P view, the guidewire lies in proximal one-third of femoral head and in the lateral view, it lies in anterior one-third of femoral head as shown in (Figuress 3 a and b)

 

 

Fig (3): a) Showing final position of guidewires in the AP view. b) Showing final position of guidewires in lateral view.

Being perpendicular to fracture surface, the middle and proximal screws are placed first followed by insertion of the distal screw as shown in (Figures 4 a and b).

 

Fig (4): a) Showing final position of screws in the AP view b) Showing final position of screws in lateral view

 

Post-operative protocol:

Postoperative radiographs were obtained on the first postoperative day. The patient was encouraged to do static quadriceps and active assisted/active Straight Leg Raising (SLR) exercises once the patient feels comfortable. The patient was made to sit up on the bedside and non-weightbearing. walking was started 24 hours after the surgery on the normal side. Patients were discharged from hospital 48 to 72 hours after surgery. All the patients were followed up clinically and radiologically after three weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, twelve months and after two years. Partial weight bearing was allowed after three weeks and full weight bearing was allowed after the radiographic union was evident. Radiologically fracture union was defined as continuity of at least three cortices in AP and lateral views without any fracture gap. Clinically fracture was considered as healed when there was no local tenderness and patient could do full weightbearing without any support.

 

RESULTS

The study included 20 patients with fracture neck of femur treated by internal fixation using the novel method Biplane Double Supported Screw Fixation (BDSF). All patient were evaluated using Haris Hip score that was used for evaluation of the functional outcome of our patients, 9 patients were excellent, 6 patients were good, 3 patients were fair, 2 patients were poor as in table 2.

 

The studied population

(N=20)

Excellent

9 (45%)

Good

6 (30%)

Fair

3 (15%)

Poor

2 (10%)

Table (2): Functional Outcome of the studied patients

DISCUSSION

The new method of Biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) increases the fixation strength by its innovative concept of biplane positioning of the three screws, which makes it possible for the screws to be placed at an increased angle, so they lean on two solid supporting points.17

The position of the distal screw as well as the middle screw achieved by the method, in terms of statics, turns them into a simple beam with an overhanging end, loaded with a vertical force. This beam with an overhanging end successfully supports the head fragment bearing the body weight and transferring it to the diaphysis. Moreover, due to the biplane placement, enough space for a third screw is provided, whereas in the conventional methods for fixing neck femur, only one or a maximum of two screws can be placed at an obtuse angle.18

Regarding demographic characterstics, the age of the patients ranges from 51 to 72 years, 65% patients were males, and in accordance with our results, the study of Kalia et al.19 that aimed to study the role of Biplane Double Supported Screw Fixation For Fracture Neck Femur In Elderly Population, and reported that Out of the 25 patients, 17 were males (68%) and 8 (32%) were females. The average age was 67.8 years. The youngest patients were aged 52 years while eldest being 88 years. Majority of the patient i.e 18 out of 25 patient belong to 60-80 years of age group.19

A retrospective study of Filipov et al.17 that aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes from the first 5-year period of patient’s treatment with the novel BDSF method for femoral neck fracture fixation the subjected patients comprised 42 males (20.28%) and 165 females (79.71%), aged 75.7 ± 10.3 (range 49–99) and 76.4 ± 9.8 (range 38–93) years, respectively, with no significant age difference between the genders (P = 0.56).17

There seems to be a lot of controversy regarding the cannulated screw fixation for fracture neck femur like the number of screws to be used, configuration of screws and their position in head and neck. The method most widely practiced by surgeons for fixing the fracture neck femur is by three cancellous screws placed parallel to each other and various authors have reported the failure rate to be as high as 20-42%.20

CONCLUSION

BDSF method was devised mainly to address that group of patients who have contraindications for arthroplasty and we have found this as an excellent method in terms of fracture consolidation and functional outcome. By providing additional cortical support, the novel BDSF method enhances femoral neck fracture fixation strength, reveals excellent clinical outcomes and is a valid alternative to other treatment methods.

  1. REFERENCES

    1. Burgers,Van Geene and Van den Bekerom,  et al. Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for            displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 2012; 36, 1549–1560.       
    2. Filipov and B.Gueorguiev. Unique stability of femoral neck fractures treated with the novel biplane double-supported screw fixation method: A biomechanical cadaver study.El Sevier 2015; 46, 218-226.    
    3. JJ Yang,LC Lin and KH Chao.et al. Risk Factors for Nonunion in Patients with Intracapsular Femoral Neck              Fractures Treated with Three Cannulated Screws Placed in Either a Triangle or an Inverted Triangle Configuration. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2013; 95,61-69.    
    4. Ye Ye,J Hao and C Mauffrey,et al. Optimizing Stability in Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation. Orthopedics 2015; 38(10):625-630.   
    5. M panteli,P Rodham and PV.Giannoudis. Biomechanical rationale for implant choices in femoral neck fracture fixation in the non-elderly.El Sevier 2015; 46, 445-452.   
    6. Rupprecht M., Grossterlinden L.and Sellenschloh K. et al. Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with posterior comminution. International Orthopaedics (SICOT)2011; 35, 1695–1701.   
    7. Florschutz, Anthony V, Langford and Joshua R. et al. Femoral Neck Fractures Current management.Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2015;29,121-12.       
    8. Y Zhang,  L Tian andY Yan,et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the expansive cannulated screw for fixation of femoral neck fractures. El Sevier 2011;42, 1372-1376.     
    9. M Butler, ML Forte, SB Joglekar and MF Swiontkowski. Evidence Summary: Systematic Review of Surgical Treatments for Geriatric Hip Fractures. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2011;93,1104-1115.
    10. BRJ Satish, AV Ranganadham,et al. Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Indian J Orthop.2013; 47(2): 174–181.
    11. P Londhe, HJ Mangukiya and B Agrawal, et al. Comparison of radiological and functional outcome in        patients with femoral neck fracture operated with dynamic hip screw versus multiple cannulated screws. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2018;4(2): 1040-1048.     
    12. O Filipov . THE METHOD OF BIPLANE DOUBLE-SUPPORTED SCREW FIXATION (BDSF) AT        FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES - PRINCIPLE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES.Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers) 2013;19:  423-428.      
    13. Murphy D.K., Randell T.and Brennan K.L. et al. Treatment and Displacement Affect the Reoperation Rate for Femoral Neck Fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471, 2691–2702 .      
    14. R Thein, A Herman and P Kedem,et al. Osteosynthesis of Unstable Intracapsular Femoral Neck                     Fracture by Dynamic Locking Plate or Screw Fixation: Early Results. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2014;28,70-76.      
    15. Mathivanan P, Prabu GR and Srinivasan A. Case series of four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixations for fractured neck of femur and their outcome. J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci 2017;6(44):3404-3410.      
    16. Huang HK, Su YP, Chen CM, Chiu FY and Liu CL. Displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults treated with closed reduction and internal fixation. Orthopedics 2010; 33(12): 873.       
    17. Filipov O. Biplane double-supported screw fixation (F-technique): A method of screw fixation at osteoporotic fractures of the femoral neck. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2011; 21(7): 539-43.       
    18. JE Gjertsen, T Vinje and LB Engesaeter, et al. Internal Screw Fixation Compared with Bipolar                     Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients.The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2010;92,619-628.      
    19. A Kalia, J Singh and N Ali. Role of Biplane Double Supported Screw Fixation For Fracture Neck Femur In Elderly Population: A Prospective Study.  The Open Orthopaedics Journal 2018;12,514-524.      
    20. S. Moerman, NMC Mathijssen and WE Tuinebreijer,et al. Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty         in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision. Acta Orthopaedica 2018; 89:5, pages 509-514.