Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Internal medicine department ,faculty of medicine, Tanta university
2 Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt
Abstract
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is not uncommon cancer moreover it is a leading cause of cancer related death worldwide.1
In Egypt CRC represented the seventh most common cancer and the third most common male neoplasm and fifth most common female neoplasm. 2
Early screening and diagnosis of CRC plays a crucial role in improving the prognosis and decreasing the CRC related mortality rate,3 fortunately there is approved guidelines for CRC screening that greatly helps in prevention and early detection.4
Although the standard age for CRC screening is above 50 years old,there is a new emerging term of early onset colorectal carcinoma (CRC diagnosed before the age of 50 years old). 5 Even more suggestion of CRC screening in average-risk individuals between ages 45 and 49 years to reduce incidence of advanced adenoma, CRC, and mortality from CRC still Conditional recommendation of very low-quality evidence.6
So, we feel that more studies addressing age distribution changes related to Colorectal carcinoma and lacking well established guidelines for screening
below standard age leading to missing of many cases of early onset colorectal carcinoma.7
In Egypt also more studies were needed to clarify age distribution related to CRC, 8,9 So we conducted this study for revision age incidence of colorectal carcinoma among Egyptian population.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In retrospective study we investigated the demographic data of 965 patients those had been diagnosed as colorectal carcinoma over eighteen years from 2000 to 2018, data had been collected from the medical records at gastroenterology and endoscopy units at Tanta university hospital and Kafr Elsheikh university hospital, Egypt (both are tertiary care hospitals covering most of Egyptian Nile delta region), we included 965 patients those who had investigated by colonoscopy for different clinical presentations and had been diagnosed as colorectal carcinoma at first time colonoscopy examination, we excluded patients already known to have CRC or those came for follow up of CRC. Data were retrieved from patients' files included demographic data age, sex and special habits as well as site of CRC, data statically analysed.
The research was conducted in line with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were collected and tabled, other demographic data were studied and analyzed, the full detailed form is SPSS 20, IBM, Armonk, NY, United States of America.
Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
RESULTS
There was progressive increase in the number of patients diagnosed to have CRC over yeas from 2000 to 2018 (table 1).
However, the mean age of all studied patients was 50.63 years old with standard deviation 14.02 as shown in (table 2), still 46.4% of total patients were below the age of 50 years old as shown in (table 3).
Male predominance in the incidence of CRC in our studied patients, as male represent 52.6 % of total studied patients versus 47.4 % females as shown in (table 4).
Left side cancer were obviously predominant in our studied patients as mainly rectosigmoid cancer were diagnosed in 35.9% of studied patients as well as cancer in descending colon represents 26.9% in our studied patients versus 7.5% and 8.2% in ascending and transverse colon respectively as shown in (table 5).
Year |
Number |
% |
2000 |
22 |
2.3 |
2001 |
18 |
1.9 |
2002 |
18 |
1.9 |
2003 |
21 |
2.2 |
2004 |
25 |
2.6 |
2005 |
39 |
4.0 |
2006 |
32 |
3.3 |
2007 |
44 |
4.6 |
2008 |
32 |
3.3 |
2009 |
48 |
5.0 |
2010 |
47 |
4.9 |
2011 |
62 |
6.4 |
2012 |
61 |
6.3 |
2013 |
79 |
8.2 |
2014 |
98 |
10.2 |
2015 |
107 |
11.1 |
2016 |
93 |
9.6 |
2017 |
90 |
9.3 |
2018 |
29 |
3.0 |
Total |
965 |
100.0 |
Table 1: number of cases per year.
Age |
N |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
2000 |
22 |
15 |
65 |
42.68 |
14.04 |
2001 |
18 |
22 |
81 |
45.61 |
15.11 |
2002 |
18 |
19 |
73 |
47.17 |
15.17 |
2003 |
21 |
19 |
72 |
47.90 |
14.88 |
2004 |
25 |
17 |
70 |
46.52 |
14.20 |
2005 |
39 |
18 |
89 |
51.69 |
14.36 |
2006 |
32 |
19 |
70 |
46.34 |
14.74 |
2007 |
44 |
17 |
73 |
53.59 |
11.88 |
2008 |
32 |
29 |
77 |
50.00 |
13.33 |
2009 |
48 |
22 |
80 |
50.77 |
14.61 |
2010 |
47 |
24 |
93 |
52.04 |
14.50 |
2011 |
62 |
25 |
80 |
53.68 |
13.64 |
2012 |
61 |
19 |
75 |
48.16 |
12.52 |
2013 |
79 |
23 |
83 |
49.92 |
15.34 |
2014 |
98 |
21 |
80 |
51.81 |
14.46 |
2015 |
107 |
25 |
77 |
51.38 |
11.48 |
2016 |
93 |
15 |
80 |
51.76 |
13.60 |
2017 |
90 |
16 |
85 |
50.83 |
16.04 |
2018 |
29 |
28 |
79 |
54.03 |
11.79 |
Total |
965 |
15 |
93 |
50.63 |
14.02 |
Table 2: Distribution of patient's age.
Year |
Age |
Total
|
||
< 50 |
≥50 |
|||
2000 |
N |
15 |
7 |
22 |
|
% |
68.2% |
31.8% |
100.0% |
2001 |
N |
12 |
6 |
18 |
|
% |
66.7% |
33.3% |
100.0% |
2002 |
N |
11 |
7 |
18 |
|
% |
61.1% |
38.9% |
100.0% |
2003 |
N |
9 |
12 |
21 |
|
% |
42.9% |
57.1% |
100.0% |
2004 |
N |
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
% |
60.0% |
40.0% |
100.0% |
2005 |
N |
19 |
20 |
39 |
|
% |
48.7% |
51.3% |
100.0% |
2006 |
N |
17 |
15 |
32 |
|
% |
53.1% |
46.9% |
100.0% |
2007 |
N |
18 |
26 |
44 |
|
% |
40.9% |
59.1% |
100.0% |
2008 |
N |
18 |
14 |
32 |
|
% |
56.3% |
43.8% |
100.0% |
2009 |
N |
25 |
23 |
48 |
|
% |
52.1% |
47.9% |
100.0% |
2010 |
N |
21 |
26 |
47 |
|
% |
44.7% |
55.3% |
100.0% |
2011 |
N |
22 |
40 |
62 |
|
% |
35.5% |
64.5% |
100.0% |
2012 |
N |
32 |
29 |
61 |
|
% |
52.5% |
47.5% |
100.0% |
2013 |
N |
34 |
45 |
79 |
|
% |
43.0% |
57.0% |
100.0% |
2014 |
N |
49 |
49 |
98 |
|
% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
100.0% |
2015 |
N |
44 |
63 |
107 |
|
% |
41.1% |
58.9% |
100.0% |
2016 |
N |
36 |
57 |
93 |
|
% |
38.7% |
61.3% |
100.0% |
2017 |
N |
43 |
47 |
90 |
|
% |
47.8% |
52.2% |
100.0% |
2018 |
N |
8 |
21 |
29 |
|
% |
27.6% |
72.4% |
100.0% |
Total |
N |
448 |
517 |
965 |
|
% |
46.4% |
53.6% |
100.0% |
Table 3: Distribution of patient's age above and below 50 years old.
Year |
Sex |
Total
|
||
Male |
Female |
|
||
2000 |
N |
12 |
10 |
22 |
|
% |
54.5% |
45.5% |
100.0% |
2001 |
N |
8 |
10 |
18 |
|
% |
44.4% |
55.6% |
100.0% |
2002 |
N |
14 |
4 |
18 |
|
% |
77.8% |
22.2% |
100.0% |
2003 |
N |
9 |
12 |
21 |
|
% |
42.9% |
57.1% |
100.0% |
2004 |
N |
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
% |
60.0% |
40.0% |
100.0% |
2005 |
N |
25 |
14 |
39 |
|
% |
64.1% |
35.9% |
100.0% |
2006 |
N |
17 |
15 |
32 |
|
% |
53.1% |
46.9% |
100.0% |
2007 |
N |
24 |
20 |
44 |
|
% |
54.5% |
45.5% |
100.0% |
2008 |
N |
14 |
18 |
32 |
|
% |
43.8% |
56.3% |
100.0% |
2009 |
N |
27 |
21 |
48 |
|
% |
56.3% |
43.8% |
100.0% |
2010 |
N |
28 |
19 |
47 |
|
% |
59.6% |
40.4% |
100.0% |
2011 |
N |
31 |
31 |
62 |
|
% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
100.0% |
2012 |
N |
38 |
23 |
61 |
|
% |
62.3% |
37.7% |
100.0% |
2013 |
N |
48 |
31 |
79 |
|
% |
60.8% |
39.2% |
100.0% |
2014 |
N |
39 |
59 |
98 |
|
% |
39.8% |
60.2% |
100.0% |
2015 |
N |
50 |
57 |
107 |
|
% |
46.7% |
53.3% |
100.0% |
2016 |
N |
45 |
48 |
93 |
|
% |
48.4% |
51.6% |
100.0% |
2017 |
N |
45 |
45 |
90 |
|
% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
100.0% |
2018 |
N |
19 |
10 |
29 |
|
% |
65.5% |
34.5% |
100.0% |
Total |
N |
508 |
457 |
965 |
|
% |
52.6% |
47.4% |
100.0% |
Table 4: Distribution of patient's sex.
|
N |
% |
|
Sex |
Male |
508 |
52.6 |
Female |
457 |
47.4 |
|
Age |
< 50 |
448 |
46.4 |
≥ 50 |
517 |
53.6 |
|
Range |
15 – 93 |
||
Mean ± SD |
50.63 ± 14.02 |
||
Median |
50 |
||
Smoking |
Smoker |
417 |
43.2 |
Nonsmoker |
548 |
56.8 |
|
Site |
Anal canal |
12 |
1.2 |
Anorectum |
87 |
9.0 |
|
Ascending colon |
72 |
7.5 |
|
Caecum |
36 |
3.7 |
|
Descending colon |
260 |
26.9 |
|
Hepatic flexure |
13 |
1.3 |
|
Rectosigmoid |
346 |
35.9 |
|
Sigmoid |
60 |
6.2 |
|
Transverse |
79 |
8.2 |
Table 5: characters of studies patients and related Colorectal carcinoma.
DISCUSSION
Amid the course of neonatal sepsis, the discharge of Our study demonstrates the increased incidence of CRC among patients below 50 years old among cohort of Egyptian population as well as increase the incidence of left side colonic cancer more than right side.
Those results go with previous studies that revealed increase incidence of CRC among Egyptian above 30 years old. 9
However, the well-known concept of decreasing the incidence and mortality of CRC, surprisingly increase the incidence of CRC among studied Egyptian population was revealed by our studies that goes with studies that explain the increase incidence among Egyptian population by westernization of diet. 10,11
However, the American Cancer Society updated their guidelines for lowering the CRC screening age for certain population as American and African, still further updating of guidelines is needed to meet the early onset CRC in Egyptian population. 12
Comparing other countries, we found similar increase in early incidence CRC in different countries as incidence per 100,000 were found 44.7 in South Korea up to 32.1 in United Kingdom.13
CONCLUSION
Colorectal carcinoma in Egypt has no age predilection, and even more rising in young population below 50 years old.