Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Internal medicine,faculty of medicine,alaxhar university
2 Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Medicine - Al-Azhar University,Cairo
3 Department of Clinical Pathology Faculty of Medicine - Al-Azhar University,Cairo
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
HCV infection was recognized early on as a significant risk factor for development of HCC, causing around one-third of all HCC cases worldwide, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the world's leading causes of cancer-related death, and the major histological type of hepatic cancer and the world's second-largest cause of cancer death for more than 500,000 people1.
Infection with the hepatitis C virus is a significant global trigger of hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon was the main antiviral therapy, which resulted in nearly half of the patients being virally free. The cure rate was significantly increased by new direct-acting antivirals to over 90% 2.
The most common primary liver carcinoma is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which makes up for about 80 % of cases. This neoplasia is still ranked 2nd overall in terms of cancer mortality, despite advances in modern oncology. Regrettably, the rise in HCC incidence is expected to continue in the coming decades.One of the primary causes of mortality and morbidity globallyis the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Hepatocarcinogenesis results from combination of superposing virus specific factors, immunological mechanisms, environmental factors and genetic background factors for persons3.
As a risk factor, the therapies regarding hepatitis C infection were questioned. Some authors pointed out that the risk of developing HCC has been minimized by continued virologic response (SVR) with therapy based on interferon. In contrast, some studies in direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-treated patients indicate an increased risk of HCC4.
It was also noted that HCC behavior in patients treated with DAA was more aggressive with respect to portal vein thrombosis, malignant lymphadenopathy, and characteristics of HCC imaging that have influenced ablation chances and response to treatment5.
Noteworthy, there was obviously no relation between US research and a few European researches, while Japanese and Egyptian research and other European research demonstrated a higher risk of developing HCC followingexposures to DAA. These conflicting findings may be due to changes in geography and ethnicity and discrepancies in design and inclusion criteria between studies 6.
Purpose of the study to assess the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in DAA-treated chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.
Patients and Method
This retrospective research was performedat Al-Azhar University, Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit, Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital. The protocol to the research was accepted by both centers’ local ethical committee.
The study included 500 chronic viral hepatitis C patients who are receiving DAAS. The patients were selected to participate in the study according to the following criteria.
Inclusion criteria:Age >18years and non-cirrhotic patients depending onultrasound.
Exclusion criteria:Extra-hepatic malignancy except after 2 Years with an interval free with disease.Patients undergoing a liver transplant just prior to studyperiod and patients with severe form of extra-hepaticmanifestation.
All the patients underwent to the following:Careful historytaking.Extensive clinical examination. Abdominal ultrasonography before therapy and at least 24 weeks after therapy.Laboratory investigations including: The following investigations were done before treat and 12, 24 and 48 weeks after treatment commencement: (i) HCV RNA quantitativePCR. (ii) Alpha fetoprotein: before therapy and after at least 24 weeks of therapy. (iii) Tests of the liver function (serum albumin, total and direct serum bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), prothrombin time andINR). (iv) Complete bloodcount. (v) Fasting blood glucose and HbA1C (in diabeticpatients). (vi)Serumcreatinine.
Outcome measures:According to current study protocol, the SVR that determines HCV cure as a result of using DAAs in patients was achieved in full by being HCC recorded cases through a 12 month after initiation of treatmentregimen.HCC cases wererecorded.
Statistical analysisResults of the present study were statistically analyzed using SPSS 25 (IBM, USA). Data were represented as median (interquartile range) or number and percent. Using Mann- Whitney U test, numerical data were compared while categorical data were compared using Fisher exact test or Chi-square test as necessary. The P value was deemed statistically significant by less than 0.05.
Results
Table (1): Basic data for the patients studied (n=500).
Age (years) |
54.0 (43.5 - 61.0) |
|
Sex |
Male |
284 (56.8) |
Female |
216 (43.2) |
|
BMI (Kg/m^2) |
29.0 (25.3 – 32.8) |
|
Albumin (mg/dl) |
3.8 (3.3 - 4.3) |
|
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) |
0.8 (0.6 - 1.1) |
|
AST (IU/L) |
46.0 (27.0 - 69.0) |
|
ALT (IU/L) |
40.0 (25.0 - 65.0) |
|
INR |
1.1 (1.0 - 1.2) |
|
Hb (gm/dl) |
13.1 (12.4 - 14.4) |
|
WBCs (10^3/ml) |
5.7 (4.4 - 7.5) |
|
Platelets (10^3/ml) |
183.0 (130.0 - 241.0) |
|
FBS (mg/dl) |
96.0 (87.0 - 108.0) |
|
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
0.9 (0.7 - 1.1) |
|
Metavir score |
F0 |
80 (16.0) |
F1 |
285 (57.0) |
|
F2 |
135 (27.0) |
Data expressed as median (Interquartile range) or number and percent
This table shows the basic laboratory data in the studied patients. They had a median (IQR) age of 54.0 (43.5 - 61.0) years and comprised 284 males (56.8%) and 216 females (43.2 %).
Table (2): Comparison ofHCC patients and patients with no basic data.
|
HCC N=7 |
Other patients N=493 |
P value |
||
Age (years) |
62.0 (56.0 - 67.0) |
54.0 (43.0 - 60.5) |
0.021 |
||
Sex |
Male |
6 (85.7) |
278 (56.4) |
0.12 |
|
Female |
1 (14.3) |
215 (43.6) |
|||
BMI (Kg/m^2) |
26.0 (24.9 - 31.5) |
29.0 (25.3 - 32.8) |
0.4 |
||
Albumin (mg/dl) |
3.7 (2.9 - 4.2) |
3.8 (3.3 - 4.3) |
0.46 |
||
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) |
0.8 (0.7 - 1.5) |
0.8 (0.6 - 1.1) |
0.4 |
||
AST (IU/L) |
29.0 (27.0 - 49.0) |
46.0 (27.0 - 67.0) |
0.22 |
||
ALT (IU/L) |
36.0 (20.0 - 58.0) |
40.0 (25.0 - 59.0) |
0.58 |
||
INR |
1.18 (1.0 - 1.22) |
1.1 (1.0 - 1.2) |
0.91 |
||
Hb (gm/dl) |
13.7 (13.0 - 14.7) |
13.1 (12.5 - 14.4) |
0.32 |
||
WBCs (10^3/ml) |
6.6 (6.0 - 8.1) |
5.7 (4.4 - 7.5) |
0.32 |
||
Platelets (10^3/ml) |
241.0 (160.0 - 254.0) |
182.0 (130.0 - 240.0) |
0.33 |
||
FBS (mg/dl) |
93.0 (84.0 - 100.0) |
97.0 (87.0 - 110.0) |
0.29 |
||
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
0.7 (0.55 - 1.3) |
0.9 (0.7 - 1.1) |
0.31 |
||
Metavir score |
F0 |
1 (14.3) |
79 (16.0) |
0.024 |
|
F1 |
1 (14.3) |
284 (57.6) |
|||
F2 |
5 (71.4) |
130 (26.4) |
|||
This table shows that HCC patients are significantly older and had significantly higher frequency of F2 Metavir stage when compared with patients without HCC.
Table (3): Comparisonof HCC patients and patients with no clinical data at 12 weeks.
|
HCC N=7 |
Other patients N=493 |
P value |
Albumin (mg/dl) |
3.1 (2.4 - 4.0) |
3.5 (3.1 - 4.0) |
0.16 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) |
1.4 (0.6 - 1.8) |
0.9 (0.7 – 1.1) |
0.17 |
AST (IU/L) |
24.0 (18.0 - 30.0) |
24.0 (19.0 - 34.0) |
0.72 |
ALT (IU/L) |
18.0 (15.0 - 27.0) |
21.0 (16.0 - 27.0) |
0.56 |
INR |
1.0 (1.0 - 1.23) |
1.1 (1.0 - 1.2) |
0.33 |
Hb (gm/dl) |
12.0 (11.5 - 14.7) |
11.5 (10.6 - 12.8) |
0.12 |
WBCs (10^3/ml) |
5.8 (4.3 - 6.7) |
5.8 (4.9 - 7.6) |
0.71 |
Platelets (10^3/ml) |
236.0 (181.0 - 266.0) |
193.0 (155.0 - 248.0) |
0.17 |
FBS (mg/dl) |
95.0 (94.0 - 118.0) |
99.0 (90.0 - 112.0) |
0.73 |
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
0.9 (0.7 – 1.1) |
0.9 (0.8 – 1.1) |
0.67 |
SVR |
7 (100.0) |
318 (64.5) |
0.15 |
This table shows no statistically significant differences between HCC patients and patients with no laboratory data at 12 weeks of treatment.
Table (4): ComparisonofHCC patients andpatientswith no clinical data at 24 weeks.
|
HCC N=7 |
Other patients N=493 |
P value |
Albumin (mg/dl) |
3.0 (2.8 - 4.0) |
3.9 (3.2 - 4.0) |
0.11 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) |
1.0 (0.6 - 1.6) |
0.9 (0.7 - 1.0) |
0.3 |
AST (IU/L) |
17.0 (16.0 - 26.0) |
20.0 (16.0 - 24.0) |
0.35 |
ALT (IU/L) |
13.0 (7.0 - 27.0) |
20.0 (15.0 - 24.0) |
0.13 |
INR |
1.0 (1.0 – 1.0) |
1.0 (1.0 - 1.1) |
0.17 |
Hb (gm/dl) |
11.5 (10.6 - 14.2) |
11.0 (10.0 - 12.0) |
0.32 |
WBCs (10^3/ml) |
5.0 (4.1 - 6.0) |
5.4 (4.7 - 7.0) |
0.37 |
Platelets (10^3/ml) |
189.0 (150.0 - 220.0) |
180.0 (149.0 - 210.5) |
0.72 |
FBS (mg/dl) |
101.0 (90.0 - 102.0) |
99.0 (90.0 - 104.0) |
0.97 |
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
1.0 (0.9 - 1.2) |
1.0 (0.9 - 1.1) |
0.37 |
SVR |
7 (100.0) |
493 (100.0) |
NA |
This table shows no statistically significant differences between HCC patients and patients with no laboratory data at 24 weeks of treatment.
Table (5):ComparisonofHCC patientsandpatientswith no clinical data at 48 weeks.
|
HCC N=7 |
Other patients N=493 |
P value |
Albumin (mg/dl) |
3.1 (2.8 - 3.9) |
3.8 (3.1 - 4.0) |
0.1 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) |
1.0 (0.7 - 1.6) |
0.8 (0.6 - 1.0) |
0.06 |
AST (IU/L) |
15.0 (14.0 - 20.0) |
18.0 (15.0 - 21.0) |
0.21 |
ALT (IU/L) |
13.0 (12.0 - 19.0) |
17.0 (12.0 - 21.0) |
0.11 |
INR |
1.1 (1.06 - 1.5) |
1.05 (1.0 - 1.2) |
0.14 |
Hb (gm/dl) |
14.1 (13.3 - 14.5) |
13.8 (13.0 - 14.7) |
0.63 |
WBCs (10^3/ml) |
6.3 (3.7 – 9.0) |
6.4 (5.3 – 8.4) |
0.89 |
Platelets (10^3/ml) |
194.0 (104.0 - 220.0) |
195.0 (174.0 - 231.0) |
0.58 |
FBS (mg/dl) |
94.0 (89.0 - 101.0) |
100.0 (91.0 - 110.0) |
0.33 |
Creatinine (mg/dl) |
1.0 (0.9 - 1.0) |
1.0 (0.9 - 1.1) |
0.53 |
Alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) +ve |
7 (100.0) |
- |
< 0.001 |
SVR |
7 (100.0) |
493 (100.0) |
NA |
This table shows that HCC patients had significantly higher frequency of APP
+ve cases after therapy ends.
Discussion
The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of HCC development in non-cirrhotic patients who are receiving DAA. The study recruited 500 patients with HCC subjected to DAA therapy. Patients were followed after achieving SVR 48 weeks following start of treatment. The HCC diagnosis was basedupon the radiological and pathologicaldata.
In this study, 7 patients out of 500 (1.4 %) acquired HCC. In comparison, the Egyptian study of Lashen et al. 7in which the authors retrospectively analyzed results of 392 F3-4 fibrosis patients and DAA-treated cirrhosis. In 7.6 % of naive patients, De novo HCC occurredwhile recurrence occurred in 28% of previous HCC patients. This high prevalence of HCC in an Egyptian population may reflect the role of liver cirrhosis as pathological correlate with developmentof HCC in patients treated with DAA with noprior history of HCC. However, other studies conducted worldwide revealed inconsistent results. In an Italian study including a total of 3,917 HCV patients treated with DAAs,55patientsdevelopedHCCinthefirstyearmakinganincidenceof1.4%. However, it should be noted this study included only cirrhotic patients 8.
In the Japanese study of Ogawa et al. 9who evaluated the short- term risk of HCC SVR patients with DAAs, and those with cirrhosis or prior HCC, the study found that HCC developed in 46 (2.7%) patients during time of follow-up (median: 17 months). Importantly, the authors, in accordance with our conclusions, reported that do novo HCC was registered in 0.4 % of non-cirrhotic patients in comparison to 4.9 % of the cirrhoticpatients.
Moreover, in the study of Kuftinec et al. 10on 150 DAA-treated patients with HCV-cirrhosis, seven patients developed HCC de novo that did not vary by 3% from historical rates. The study noted substantially higher HCC rates in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
For another Japanese study, a total of 1,174 chronic hepatitis C virus patients were treated with DAA.In 33 instances, HCC developed over median observation duration of 537 days.HCC incidence was 1.9%, 3.2%, and 4.1% respectively at 1, 1.5, and 2 years after the completion of DAA therapy11. On the other hand, the study of Yoo et al. 12on 574 HCV patients receiving direct-acting antiviraltherapyfor at least 24 weeks, found that the cumulative HCC incidence was 0.47%. Unfortunately, these two studies didn’t report the percentage of cirrhosis patients according to the Metavirscore.Multiple mechanisms for the occurrence of HCC and rapid immune changes have also been documented, includes cytokines and chemokines during and following DAA therapy13.
The most potential mechanisms include the following points:
Immune cell dysfunction: Initial dataregarding the T-cell functionwere published in 2014during and after direct-acting antiviral therapy14.In 51 previously untreated and chronically infected patients receiving DAAS therapy, treatment the researchers analyzed virus-specific CD8+ T cells and in patients receiving SVR within 4 weeks of treatment, the frequency of HCV-specific CD8 + T cells increased significantly, whereas there are no alterations in patients with therapeutic failure were observed. Result of infection with HCV revealed reversible immune dysfunctionand that even short treatment was able to restore immune capacity with novel DAAs.
Change in immune cytokine network: Two studies recorded a rapid decreaseinIL-18 serum early after beginning DAA therapy Spaan et al. 15and Carlin et al. 16 that was not confirmed by others Ning et al. 17.
Activation of angiogenesis: Faillaci et al.18, analyzed levels of serum liver angiopoietin-2 and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) in 242 DAA-treated patients and the DAA-mediated increase in VEGF and angiopoietin-2 resulted in an elevated risk of HCC occurring during antiviral treatment.
In this study, comparison between HCC patients and patients without at the end of treatment regarding the basic data revealed that HCCpatients were significantly older. This finding is consistent with the study of Ogawa et al. 9who noted that patients with HCVwho developed de novo HCC were substantially older than those without it.
In spite of the fact that HCC patients in the present study comprised higher frequency of males, the difference between those patients and patients without HCC fell short of statistical significance. In contrast, the study of Liu et al. 19identified male sex as a significant risk factor for developing HCC following DAAdrugs.
In our study, in accordance with Yoo et al’s study, all patients with alpha-fetoprotein elevation (AFP) developed HCC at the end of treatment12. In their work on 574 HCV patients treated with DAA, multivariate analysis revealed that the levels of alpha-fetoprotein >9.5 ng/mL was the only independent early development risk factor for HCC when treatment ended.
Conclusions
Among the studied patients, 7 patents out of 500 (1.4 %) acquired hepatocellular carcinoma after 48 weeks of treatment as confirmed by the imaging and pathological studies.
In relation to the various demographic, clinical and laboratory data, hepatocellular carcinoma patients were found to be significantly older when compared with other patients.
All chronic hepatitis C patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein at the end of treatment developed hepatocellular carcinoma.