DETECTION AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF IMPORTED MALARIA IN EGYPT

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University. Assiut

2 Parasitology Department, Al-Azhar University

3 Department of Parasitology, Kasar Al-Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt. Department of Microbiology - Medical Parasitology Section, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

4 Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, Egypt.

5 1Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo,Egypt

Abstract

DETECTION AND GENETIC ANALYSIS OF IMPORTED MALARIA IN EGYPT
ABSTRACT
Background: Microscopy consider the gold standard test for diagnosis of malaria although application of it is limited to use to highly experienced microscopists. Serological tests and nPCR is providing efficient diagnostic tests and applied for malaria diagnosis and research.
The work aim: The work aim is detection and genetic analysis of imported malaria in Egypt.
Patients and method:This study is a cross section one.750 patients’ blood samples were collected from different laboratories in Egypt from persons travel to African endemic areas coming to Egypt within previous 8 weeks; in the period from August 2017 to August 2018. All samples were examined microscopically, immunologically by(RDT) and 21positive cases examined by nPCR as a confirmatory test and for detection of parasite genotype.
Results:Plasmodium species were identified microscopically in27(3.6%) out of750 individuals, 13of them were diagnosed as Pl.falciparum,7 were Pl.vivax, one was Pl.ovale and6 were mixed infection with Pl.falciparum and Pl.vivax. nPCR for species identification were performed for 21cases positive by first step PCR. 12cases were Pl.falciparum; 5cases were Pl.vivax and 4were mixed Pl.falciparum and Pl.vivax infections. The result of nPCR was exactly identical to the microscopic result.
Conclusion:the major two species of malaria imported to Egypt were P.vivax and P.falciparum. Detection of species of malaria microscopically stills the gold standard test.Using nested PCR tests for diagnosis of malaria and its species is highly accurate, sensitive and specific, and able to detect species of malaria.

Keywords


Malaria is a disease that affects about 3.4 million persons1 of which 2.57 million and 2.5 million are at risk for P.falciparum and P.vivax respectively while P.ovale and P.malariae have a small percentage.2
WHO recorded in the world Malaria Report 2012 that1.2 million people died due to malaria infection 3. In Africa, malaria is considered the second cause of death among transmitting diseases after AIDS 4.
WHO considers malaria as a treatable, controllable, and preventable disease 5. So, a lot of malaria control interventions were applied including indoor residual
spray (IRS)6. Artemisinin combined treatment (ACT) was used as the 1st-line of treatment 7.
Examination of blood smears (stained by Giemsa) microscopically is considered the standard method
for malaria diagnosis 8 where parasitic stages can be detected by microscopists. Detection of malarial antigens by RDTs as well as PCR are considered other new important methods for the diagnosis of malaria 9.
Screening protocol for malaria species has 2 steps: First, a rapid real-time PCR to detect malaria parasites by targeting their gene including ssRNA genes. The second is conventional PCR including nested-PCR (nt-PCR) assays (for +ve samples) 10

Screening of malaria is necessary to detect hot areas of malaria infection where control measures are not effective11. So, the present work aimed to screen imported malaria in Egypt.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This study is a cross-sectional one. It was performed to detect the prevailing malaria species in seven hundred and fifteen blood samples. The blood samples were collected from different medical laboratories in Cairo from travelers to endemic African areas either Egyptians or foreigners coming to Egypt within the previous eight weeks, in the period from August 2017 to August 2018. Malaria diagnosis was determined according to clinical manifestations, travel history, and the positive results of microscopic examination as well as RDTs [Abon Biopharm (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd., China]. Thin and thick blood films were prepared from all blood samples then RDT was performed to all blood samples, the rest of blood samples were collected in dry clean sterile tubes which contain EDTA, then stored at 2–8C for up to 3 days or at −20°C to store it for a longer duration for molecular studies (PCR and nPCR).
Parasitological Examination: Thin and thick blood films were prepared and stained by 10% Giemsa-stain 12, then examined microscopically by experts.
Immunological method: RDT interpretation: C band development indicates test validity. In case of presence of C band only indicate –ve result. The presence of pf band (with C band) indicates +ve result for P. falciparum (Fig.1).
Figure (1): P. falciparum + ve RDT
The presence of a pan band (with C band) indicates +ve results for P.vivax, P.ovale, or P. malariae. (Fig. 2).
Figure (2): Species – ve RDT
Molecular Studies: All microscopically positive blood samples for Plasmodium were subjected for nested-PCR (nPCR) analysis. The molecular assay was done in 3 main steps :
i.Extraction of genomic DNA from blood: We use (the Monarch PCR & DNA Cleanup Kit) to extract Genomic DNA from all dried blood samples.
ii. Amplification of extracted genomic DNA using nPCR: Extracted genomic DNA from each blood sample was used for PCR amplification, using Monarch PCR & DNA Cleanup Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Using the primers designed based on the sequence of SSU rRNA of Plasmodium 13. The sense and antisense primers of plasmodium species which were (rPLU5) 5`-CCT GTT GTT GCC TTA AAC TTC-3` and(rPLU6) 5`-TTA AAA TTG TTG CAG TTA AAA CG-3`, respectively were used in the first PCR. PCR product size 1100 bp was recovered in positive samples. PCR products from Plasmodium genomic DNA were amplified using the rPLU1 and rPLU5 primers for detection of Plasmodium species, while further amplified in nested (second) PCR 4 reactions used the sense and antisense primers of (i) P. falciparum [the sense primer (rFAL1) 5`-TTA AAC TGG TTT GGG AAA ACC AAA TAT ATT-3` and antisense primer (rFAL2) 5`-ACA CAA TGA ACT CAA TCA TGA CTA CCC GTC-3`] with PCR product size 205 bp, (ii) P.vivex [(PV18SF ) 5`-GAA TTT TCT CTT CGG AGT TTA TTC-3` and (PV18SR) 5`-GTA GAA AAG GGA AAG GGA AAC TGT TA-3`]with PCR product size 419 bp, (iii) P. malariae [(PM18SF) 5`-GAG ACA TTC ATA TAT ATG AGT GTT TCT-3` and (PM18SR)5`-GGG AAA AGA ACG TTT TTA TTA AAA AAA AC-3`] with PCR product size 423 bp, (iv) P. ovale [(PO18SF) 5`-GAA AAT TCC TTT TGG AAA TTT CTT AG-3` and (PO18SR) 5`-GGG AAA AGG ACA CTA TAA TGT ATC-3`] with PCR product size 410 bp 14.
Three microliters of the DNA template were used for PCR amplification in the reaction mixture of the master mix and 50 pmol of each primer. PCR cycling condition for 1st PCR was as follows: denaturation at 94˚C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94˚C for 30 sec, 55˚C for 1 min, 72˚C for 1 min, and then 72˚C for 4 min.
For 2ry PCR, the cycling conditions were as follows: Heating of mixture at 93 ºC for three minutes then 30 cycles of denaturation at 93 ºC for 30 s, annealing at 58 ºC for 45 s, and extension at72 ºC for 45s. The expected amplification product size was 205 bp
(P.falciparum) 419 bp(P.vivax) 423 bp (P.malariae) and 410bp (P.ovale).
iii. Detection of PCR amplification products using gel electrophoresis and ultra-violet light (U.V) trans-illumination:
DNA amplification was confirmed by running PCR products on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis then stained by ethidium bromide and visualized by UV transilluminator.
Cycle sequencing and data analysis. The Plasmodium species that were detected within DNA isolates were assessed by DNA sequencing using the positive amplified PCR products and multiple alignments of obtained nucleotide sequences. Positive PCR products were prepared as follows to be sent for sequencing.
Purification of the amplified nPCR products. This procedure is done to remove unwanted impurities and contaminants as enzymes, dyes, salts, and incorporated nucleotides. Cycle sequencing. Frederick Sanger enzymatic dideoxy DNA sequencing technique is a DNA sequencing method that depends on the selection of chain-terminating dideoxynucleotide incorporation with DNA polymerase during DNA replication in vitro15. Direct

bidirectional DNA sequencing of each purified positive nPCR product was performed.
Data Statistical analysis: Data were fed to the computer and analyzed by IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).
Quantitative data descriptions were performed using mean value. Qualitative data descriptions were performed using numbers and percentages.
P-value >0.05 was considered insignificant.
Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the ethical committee of Al-Azhar University, Egypt.
RESULTS
Among the examined persons, 250 (33.3%) of them were females and 500 (66.6%) were males. The average age was 34.6 years, ranging from 1 and 69 years. The average period between returning from the malaria-endemic area to the onset of symptoms was 14.5 days. Fever was reported in 350 cases during sampling and 400 cases had no fever during sampling. Plasmodium species were identified microscopically in 27 (3.6%) out of 750 individuals, 13 of them were diagnosed as P. falciparum, 7 were P. vivax, one was P. ovale and 6 were mixed infection with P. falciparum and P. vivax (Table1). Microscopy No. % P. falciparum 13 48.2
P. vivax
7
25.9 P. falciparum & P. vivax 6 22.2
P. ovale
1
3.7 Total 27 100
Table (1): Distribution of positive cases by microscopy (n = 27)
RDT was performed for the examined cases and positive results were obtained among 28 cases, twenty-seven of them had parasitemia and antigenemia while one had antigenemia only with a history of past infection.
Nested PCR for species identification was performed for 21 cases positive by first step PCR, 12 cases were P. falciparum, 5 cases were P. vivax and 4 were mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infections (Table 2). No. % nPCR
P.falciparum
12
57.1 P.vivax 5 23.8
P. falciparum & P.vivax
4
19.1 Total 21 100
Table (2): Distribution of positive malaria cases according to nPCR (n = 21)
The result of nPCR was identical to the microscopic result (Table 3). Microscopy Nested PCR P. falciparum (n = 12) P. vivax (n = 5) P. falciparum + P. vivax (n = 4)
No.
%
No.
%
No.
% P.falciparum 12 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
P. vivax
0
0.0
5
100.0
0
0.0 P. falciparum + P. vivax 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 100.0
Table (3): Relation between microscopy and nPCR (n = 21)
The LAST results of the sequencing of nPCR products revealed 2 species P. falciparum (12 cases) and P. vivax (5 cases). While 4 nPCR products were positive for mixed infection of P. vivax and P. falciparum.
Past history of malaria among positive cases (n = 27) was present in 3 cases. The major species of imported malaria were P. falciparum and P. vivax that coming from 11 African countries (Table 4).

1. World Health Organization (WHO). WorldMalaria Report 2013. Available at: https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2013/report/en/. Accessed 9th January 2020. 2. Gething PW, Patil AP, Smith DL, GuerraCA, and Elyazar IR et al. A new world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2010. Malar J, 2011; 10(1):378. 3. World Health Organization (WHO). WorldMalaria Report 2012. Available at: https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2012/en/. Accessed 15th January 2020. 4. Murray CJ, Rosenfeld LC, Lim SS, Andrews KG, and Foreman KJ et al. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet, 2012;379(9814):413-31.
5. World Health Organization (WHO). Globalmalaria control and elimination – Report of a technical review. April 2008. Available at: https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/ atoz/9789241596756/en/ Accessed 19th January 2020. 6. Pluess B, Tanser FC, Lengeler C, Sharp BL.Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010; 4:1-47. 7. Murray CK, Bennett JW. Rapid diagnosis ofmalaria. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis,2009; 2009:1-7. 8. Rosenthal PJ. How do we best diagnosemalaria in Africa? Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2012; 86(2):192-3. 9. Bell D, Wongsrichanalai C, Barnwell JW.Ensuring quality and access for malaria diagnosis: how can it be achieved? Nat Rev Microbiol, 2006;4(9):S7-20. 10. Imwong M, Tanomsing N, PukrittayakameeS, Day NP and White NJ et al. Spurious amplification of a Plasmodium vivax small-subunit RNA gene by use of primers currently used to detect P. knowlesi. J Clin Microbiol, 2009;47:4173-5. 11. Drakeley CJ, Corran PH, Coleman PG,Tongren JE, and McDonald SL et al. Estimating medium- and long-term trends in malaria transmission by using serological markers of malaria exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005;102(14):5108-13. 12. Chotivanich K, Silamut K, Day NPJ.Laboratory diagnosis of malaria infection-a short review of methods. Aust J Med Sci, 2006; 27(1):11-5. 13. Ridley RG, White JH, McAleese SM, GomanM, and Alano P et al. DNA polymerase δ: gene sequences from Plasmodium falciparum indicate that this enzyme is more highly conserved than DNA polymerase α.Nucl Acids. Res, 19(24):6731-6. 14. Li J, Wang X, Zhang G, Githure JI, and YanG et al. Genome-block expression assisted association studies to discover malaria resistance genes in Anopheles gambiae. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2013; 110(51):20675-80. 15. Sanger F, Coulson AR. A rapid method fordetermining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA Polymerase. J Mol Biol, 1975;94(3):441-8. 16. D’Acremont V, Lengeler C, Genton B.
Reduction in the proportion of fevers associated with Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia in Africa: a systematic review.
Malar J, 2010; 9:240. 17. Eyobo MB, Awur AC, Wani G, Julla AI, andRemijo CD et al. Malaria indicator survey 2009, South Sudan: baseline results at the household level. Malar J, 2014; 13:45. 18. Kamel MM, Attia SS, Emam GD, AlSherbiny NA. The validity of rapid malaria tests and microscopy in detecting malaria in a pre-elimination region of Egypt. Scientifica 2016; 2016:4048032. 19. Thongdee P, Chaijaroenkul W, Kuesap J, Na-Bangchang K. Nested-PCR, and a New ELISA-Based Nova Lisa Test Kit for Malaria Diagnosis in an Endemic Area of Thailand. Korean J Parasitol, 2014; 52(4):377-81.
20. Li Z, Zhang Q, Zheng C, Zhou S, and Sun Jet al. Epidemiologic features of overseas imported malaria in the People’s Republic of China. Malar J, 2016; 15:141.
29
DISCUSSION
Due to a lack of awareness of clinical manifestations and methods of diagnosis of malaria among private clinics and primary health care units due to low endemicity of malaria in Egypt. Added to this,
traveling of large numbers of Egyptians to malaria-endemic countries for working and other different causes.
So the aim of this work was the detection of as well as genetic analysis of imported malaria in Egypt based on clinical and laboratory assessment, through the examination of 750 blood samples of suspicious malaria-infected people coming from endemic African countries using thick and thin blood film techniques, RDT for screening and Nested PCR as a confirmatory test and genetic analysis.
In the present work, it was found that out of 750 malaria suspicious patients coming from endemic countries 27(3.6%) were infected. History of fever was found in all +ve cases and this corresponding to deferent universal malaria screening research studies 16. All positive patients gave a history of travel to one of the following 11 African countries mentioned in Table 4. Most of them had a history of traveling to Sudan.
Diagnosis of Plasmodium species using microscopic examination is still the gold standard method for laboratory diagnosis 17. In the present work, P. falciparum and P. vivax were the two major imported malaria species. The presence of one more positive case as detected by RDT means the presence of antigenemia without parasitemia due to the particles of the parasite my still in the blood for some time after cure, so it's difficult to detect active infection from recent infection clearance. In another study, 2 cases were RDT positive but not detected
microscopically due to low parasitemia or presence of malaria antigen in blood after drug intake and blood clearance of parasite 18.
The result of nPCR was identical to the microscopic results. So results of the nPCR in our study revealed a very good confirmatory diagnostic test and with specificity and sensitivity 100% in the detection of P. falciparum and P. vivax. Another research in Thailand was performed using nPCR to detect malaria species, its result also approaches 100%19.
A Chinese study was performed on 1420 cases to detect imported malaria. P. falciparum was detected in 723 cases (50.9 %) and P. vivax in 629 cases (44.3 %).
P. falciparum and P. vivax were the 2 major species, with 58.9 % of cases coming from Africa and 39.4% coming from Southeast Asia 20.
CONCLUSION
The two major malaria species in patients coming from Africa in our study were P. falciparum and P. vivax. Despite microscopic examination of Giemsa stained blood films is considered the gold standard method for laboratory diagnosis of malaria, nPCR was a very good confirmatory diagnostic test with 100% specificity and sensitivity
RDT is less specific and sensitive than nPCR, but it is rapid, simple, and lower in cost compared to nPCR. So it can be used for screening of blood in blood bank and screening of endemic areas to detect infected cases and carriers.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest